Fire alarm caused by burnt food, San Jose CA
Fire & ArsonFire crews responded to a smoke alarm at the Summer Wind Stonebridge Apartments in San Jose. They found that smoke from burnt food had triggered the alarm. There was no fire or danger, and the system was reset.
Audio|Source: San Jose Fire
02:36
Transcript:
00:00
Engine 26 San Jose Copyuron route is the Summer Wind Stonebridge Apartments Smoke Detector First Floor North hallway.
00:09
One call from the alarm.
00:15
Engine 10, San Jose.
00:16
Engine 10, San Jose.
00:21
Engine 10.
00:24
Engine 10. You're en route to Bethel Church, 33-year-old male who's in the parking lot, called 911 because he took two tablets of Claritin in two hours on accident, and the box says not to take more than one in 24-hour time span.
00:41
We are landline with poison control.
00:44
No ambulance has been dispatched yet.
00:50
Interesting.
00:56
Engine 29, Medical, Alipanti Drive, near Pamela Drive and Zankar Road.
01:03
Station 29's area.
01:09
Engine 10, San Jose.
01:14
And Jensen,
01:18
you can return to service for poison control.
01:21
It's completely safe and they're recommending that no fire response is needed.
01:26
I'll show you back in service.
01:27
Command 21 from EngineAE GAS is on scene.
01:35
I see.
01:38
Command 21 copies PG&E Gas on scene.
01:44
Engine 8's been cleared from the structure.
01:47
We are back on Sunday, then.
01:50
Engineade, background standards there.
01:52
Back in service.
01:57
Engine 14, Medical, Parkwest Drive, near Viejo Drive and Southwood Drive, Station 14's area.
02:13
Engine 26, good.
02:17
This was burnt food activation.
02:20
This is being reset, we're back in service.
02:26
Engine 26 confirmed, you said just burnt food?
02:31
Not to permit, burnt food.
02:33
Isolated, it's just the food.
02:35
They have no extension.
Disclaimer:
This transcript was automatically generated and may contain inaccuracies. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
Stonebridge Ct, San Jose, CA 95125
This shows a Google Street View of the area near the location, which might not be the exact address.
Correct
Incorrect
